SWOT Analysis: Bringing Internal and External Factors Together
The SWOT Analysis, sometimes referred to as the SWOT Matrix, is a business framework that aids in evaluating a wide range of variables that might significantly affect a company’s performance. These elements could either be internal or external to a corporation. Additionally, a corporation may find these elements advantageous/helpful or unfavorable/harmful. One may create a 22 matrix with four quadrants, representing Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats, by combining these two dimensions. Each of these four SWOT analysis quadrants will be covered in this article, which will also assist you in selecting the best tools for determining the most significant variables that might have an impact on your company.
Strengths (SWOT Analysis)
A company’s strengths are the traits that set it apart from rivals (competitors). These advantages may also be referred to as competitive advantage, firm-specific advantages, or unique selling points (USPs). These advantages come from assets and skills that are valuable, uncommon, difficult to duplicate, and supported by the entire firm. The VRIO framework may be used to assess the resources of a business. Patents, a reputable brand, a fresh, inventive product, a skilled personnel, historically established know-how, and sizable cash reserves are a few examples of important firm resources. Another method of determining where a company’s strengths originate is to perform a value chain analysis. The qualities that set a corporation apart from rivals are its strengths (competitors). Other names for these advantages include competitive advantage, firm-specific advantages, and unique selling points (USPs). Resources and skills that are valued, uncommon, difficult to duplicate, and supported throughout the company are the source of these strengths. A good tool for assessing a company’s resources is the VRIO framework. Patents, a well-known brand, a cutting-edge product, a skilled workforce, historically established know-how, and sizable cash reserves are a few examples of important corporate resources. Value Chain Analysis is another method for determining where a company’s strengths originate.
Weaknesses (SWOT Analysis)
These methods are also highly beneficial in identifying a company’s shortcomings. These flaws are aspects of the firm that provide it an unfair competitive edge over rivals. In other words, they hurt a business. For instance, weaknesses might include a lack of patent protection, a terrible customer reputation, a low working capital, inadequate management, and an ineffective production process. The easiest way to find weaknesses is to set up enough internal and external feedback loops. Consider doing consumer surveys and planning regular employee meetings. The internal aspect of the company and the SWOT analysis are formed by the strengths and weaknesses taken together.
Opportunities (SWOT Analysis)
Opportunities are the external SWOT analysis aspects that could have a favourable impact on a company’s success. A corporation should search for aspects of the environment that it may use to its advantage while evaluating the prospects. The ideal method for evaluating external influences is to use Porter’s Five Forces for industry dynamics and PESTEL analysis for the macroenvironment. PESTEL examines macro-environmental patterns in the areas of politics, economy, society, technology, the environment, and law. Examples include the growing purchasing power of consumers, government assistance programmes, more advantageous trade agreements, and general changes in people’s lifestyles. Porter’s Five Forces, on the other hand, focuses more intently on elements that are peculiar to an industry, such as the level of competition, the strength of suppliers upstream and buyers downstream, possible new competitors, and alternative goods and services.
Threats (SWOT Analysis)
The external elements that might harm the business in the future are the dangers, on the other hand. To evaluate the components in the environment that might hurt the firm, one could use a PESTEL analysis and a Porter’s Five Forces model, similar to how one would evaluate opportunities. An increasing unemployment rate, disruptive technology, NGO demonstrations, and rising government corruption are a few examples of negative macro-environmental phenomena. One can consider replacement items becoming available, new rivals joining the market, and suppliers’ growing negotiating strength when considering dangers particular to a certain industry. The external component of the SWOT analysis is made up of the opportunities and threats put together.
A SWOT analysis aids in determining the internal and external conditions of an organization, but it does not offer specific strategic measures to be taken. The so-called TOWS matrix is one tool for outlining a company’s strategic alternatives (or TOWS analysis). Management may develop four fundamental strategies to employ depending on the scenario by fusing the possibilities and threats of the external environment with the strengths and weaknesses of the internal organization:
WT situation: Mini-Mini strategy
The firm in this scenario has little chances for growth. It functions in a hostile environment and has a limited ability to change. It lacks important strengths that could fend off attackers. The Mini-Mini approach seeks to reduce both threats and vulnerabilities. Mini-Mini strategy essentially entails either attempting to survive by combining with another firm in an optimistic position or, in a pessimistic one, liquidating a company.
WO situation: Mini-Maxi strategy
The organization currently faces more vulnerabilities (weaknesses), but there are many options to address them in its environment. The Mini-Maxi approach seeks to minimize the possibilities while maximizing the disadvantages. Utilizing these chances while minimizing or addressing organizational flaws should be part of the approach. One solution may be to outsource tasks or buy a firm with the appropriate capabilities.
ST situation: Maxi-Mini strategy:
In this instance, we observe a powerful firm working in a dangerous setting. Maximizing a company’s strengths while limiting its risks through those strengths is the goal of a Maxi-Mini strategy. A business that has the resources and know-how to cut costs might drop its pricing to oust rivals.
SO, situation: Maxi-Maxi strategy:
Any business wants to be in a position where it can take advantage of both its strengths and its prospects. Such a business may take the initiative by playing to its advantages and using its resources to seize possibilities the market presents. In these circumstances, businesses may consider diversifying their product line or going global in an effort to increase sales. You might wish to have a look at the Ansoff Matrix, a well-known business growth framework, for this expansion potential.
SWOT Analysis in Sum
The SWOT analysis’s ability to integrate several research strands and perspectives—such as the Resource Based View (RBV) and Industrial Organization (I/O) perspectives—is fantastic. While the VRIO framework relied too much on internal resources and capabilities as a source of competitive advantage, frameworks like Porter’s Five Forces were criticized for focusing too much on the external environment to identify a company’s profit potential. In order to increase a company’s chances of success, it is necessary to consider both internal and external elements. To examine the existing situation and consider potential next moves, a SWOT analysis and a TOWS analysis provide an excellent place to start.
Also Read: Marketing Funnel: Visualizing the Customer Journey